Comments on: granulomatous variant not a rosacea subtype http://rosacea-support.org/granulomatous-variant-not-a-rosacea-subtype.html Where the rosacea community meets to support each other Tue, 22 May 2012 17:53:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: lawrence schneider http://rosacea-support.org/granulomatous-variant-not-a-rosacea-subtype.html/comment-page-1#comment-36480 lawrence schneider Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:05:49 +0000 http://rosacea-support.org/granulomatous-variant-not-a-rosacea-subtype.html#comment-36480 My wife (white, 72) has a solitary papule in middle of forehead. No other manifestations of granulomatous diseases. Dermatologist clin imp was BCC. Incisional bx was granulomatous dermatitis with follicular accentuation. Comment: c/w papular lesion of granulomatous rosacea. Cannot r/o sarcoid. Microorganisms were ruled out. Did not mention whether this was necrotizing. Does this form of rosacea present as an isolated lesion? Should the ddx include f0reign body rx? My wife (white, 72) has a solitary papule in middle of forehead. No other manifestations of granulomatous diseases.

Dermatologist clin imp was BCC. Incisional bx was granulomatous dermatitis with follicular accentuation.
Comment: c/w papular lesion of granulomatous rosacea. Cannot r/o sarcoid. Microorganisms were ruled out.

Did not mention whether this was necrotizing.

Does this form of rosacea present as an isolated lesion?

Should the ddx include f0reign body rx?

]]>