Hi Starbuck,
The only time I ever had food testing, it was thoroughly unscientific. I was young, but not at all credulous. However, my mother was very influenced by a group of young ladies she was working with and they strongly recommended a naturopath. I would have faith in scientific testing of foods, or of skin tests, but
not pendulum waving (nor the phony 'muscle strength' tests), so was profoundly unimpressed by his claims that I was allergic to dairy and all gluten products and shouldn't eat any kind of fruit except the plainest such as apples, oranges, bananas. He said even berries and stone fruit were too rich for my system.
I regarded it as total hooha, but since his other dietary recommendations were sensible (eg the health benefits of almonds, drinking more water, etc.) I thought it worth giving it a good trial for six months. It made no difference to my skin, but my cat at the time thought the goat's milk was fabulous.

Many years later, I started getting severe breathing problems, broken blood vessels, and other problems from plums and one kind of tropical fruit, so ... who knows?
He seemed a pleasant fellow, but not someone I would return to. Sad to see him reported in the local newspaper a few years later when he was convicted of wilfully ignoring the signs of advancing cancer in a patient and encouraging her to keep using only 'natural remedies', thus helping bring forward her death. Optimism is good, but wishful thinking helps no one, imho.
Now, Starbuck, did you have your test? What kind of testing was it? What were the recommendations? Please spill the beans! Sorry if you have already reported this in another thread.
Kind regards,
Aurelia