jayinoz wrote:I agree 'songboy' has a negative story to tell without benefit to himself. All on this forum seem to be very negative against the surgery due to his story. My question is if today's side affects are so bad so often then why do the specialists still recommend it for sever cases and why are they all not broke due to litigation cases against them.
The problem we have is that when you keep misunderstanding - and misrepresenting - the material you are directed to, it seems pointless to go on discussing this with you.
People are NOT only opposed to ETS due to Songboy's story. A lot of people tell the same story, to varying degrees of disability. Do you think Sweden banned ETS because of one American, or because of documented, provable damage caused over a long period of time to large numbers of Swedish citizens?
Why aren't the surgeons broke from litigation cases? As previously explained, most patients feel a lot better right after the op, which is why most of the rapturous reports come in that "honeymoon period". The timespan for bringing malpractice law suits is often too short for the worst side effects to have come out. By the time most patients want to sue, it is too late.
Consider Alexandra Parker, who was a radio journalist in her 30s. In 2002 she had ETS for armpit hyperhidrosis (severe sweating). There were no side effects for more than a year. Then she developed arthritis, extreme pain from her shoulders to her fingertips, vertigo, nausea, fatigue, constant headaches, racing heart, and much else besides. "
I am now on Government payments for disability. I can never work again. I can never have children. I can never be normal again." It took a further two years to establish that this stemmed from brachial plexus injury caused by ETS. In Texas the malpractice limit is two years so the doctor was untouchable. Also, she had signed the obligatory pre-op consent form.
Again,
no one is saying that
everyone who has ETS will be badly affected. Some patients are happy long-term, but studies have shown that the majority of satisfied patients have the op only for palmar hyperhidrosis (sweaty hands), where the nerves are cut at a lower point. To affect facial flushing and blushing, the nerves have to be cut higher up the chain, and the higher up, the greater the risk of doing irreparable damage. It's one hell of a gamble.
That's why an increasing number of ETS surgeons are refusing to perform the op for anything other than sweating, on the grounds that the risk profile for facial flushing, blushing and rosacea is unacceptably bad. If your surgeon says otherwise, and you choose to believe him, that is your choice. Again, your body, your life, your choice.
However, anyone who comes onto the boards and pastes up bumf about how wonderful and incredibly safe ETS is will get this kind of response - and all the more so if they offer ETS as a cure for rosacea.
Kind regards,
Aurelia